POOLS - Swimming Pool, Above Ground Pool | ||
Federal Court, COURTS - Supreme Court Justice, District Court - Shopping | ||
transparent armor, periodic table, aluminum foilsmelting, alumina, world alumina | ||
1
|
|
|
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Right to silence. (Discuss) |
| This article or section needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of the article are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. Please include more appropriate citations from reliable sources, or discuss the issue on the talk page. This article has been tagged since October 2007. |
Adverse inference is a legal inference, adverse to the concerned party, drawn from silence or absence of requested evidence. It is part of evidence codes based on common law in various countries.
According to Lawvibe, "the \'adverse inference\' can be quite damning at trial. Essentially, when plaintiffs try to present evidence on a point essential to their case and can’t because the document has been destroyed (by the defendant), the jury can infer that the evidence would have been adverse to (the defendant), and adopt the plaintiff’s reasonable interpretation of what the document would have said..." Virgin Gets Hammered by Adverse Inference, LawVibe.com, April 4, 2007.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit pointed out in 2004, in a case involving spoliation (destruction) of evidence, that "...the giving of an adverse inference instruction often terminates the litigation in that it is \'too difficult a hurdle\' for the spoliating party to overcome. The court therefore concluded that the adverse inference instruction is an \'extreme\' sanction that should \'not be given lightly\'...". Issuance of Adverse Inference Instruction often ends the litigation
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia